Czar Replacement

Tossing this out:
Governor Dean for Office of Health Reform

And what about the Black Hole of Politico. Or is it Red Bull?
Speaking of Politico, Agriculture and Homeland Security.
Governors are CEO's. HELLO!
Of course government is not a business,
but tell that to Bush and to those who voted for the MBA President.
If it was, it would be in the red.
GOOD BYE! Rummy,Rove et al.
How has the Drug Czar and the war on drugs been doing anyway?
Fine for the pharmaceuticals I guess.
Speaking of hurting.

FN/FP erization?

11-14-14 platonics(b.s.), co-op(T)ed, where T= "A Deeper Mess Age." of (fp3-erization)
no f 'n p4. where p3= axis of good(ow) ? 'n p4~erization ~> Rat Races Van Mices? ,(fp), (fp), Un-Social Darwinism. , Try Angle , (mee) [axis of good : Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope , I.Q.* (draft) , Red Bull... ]

I.Q.* (draft)

*pre-dated
Isolation
Quarantine
~~~
M O W / spring: A.  B.  Tin Foil Herman
~ : Speculative Physics

Speculative Physics

MOW + cheese

W.

Red Bull...

 I.Q. (2.0) (10-29-14)
~~~~~~~~~~~
Information
Quotient
conflation / inflation ? [!]

 

 

The Hood? ... ?

[The aves, and the aveknots or avenauts.]

Bah bah bah bah bah a ram beau.

The Beach Boy sheep(1) and the Dixie Check(*)? 

(1.)  [a.] Mmmm MOW, MOW, [b.] R.S.V.P., c.Red Bull..., [d.] Tin Foil Herman
(*) spell check[!]

3-6-14 un-reads.
M-beds

Red Bull...

Has Wings,

but it won't fly the GOP.

(Costa Con/cordia, Ctrl F "sinking".)

Papa mmm mow, mow, the bill is the word.

It it any coincidence that Wisconsin is the home of Paul Ryan and Reince Priebus, and Scott Walker?

[1-31-12: Tip of the Turnaround. Previous Ed* Show]

* previous Romney cracks in leadership: "haven't seen the ad"[!]

[It is sad that Reince Priebus believes that he is being funny, but I still can't be sure. (An Inconvenient Pie Chart)]

Republican Shadow Government calls for Obama Impeachment.

The Thom Hartmann Show, today.

Here are two further points. Not only is the crisis in leadership a myth in the form of the president not being a legislator and not being a unitary executive, but with Romney and his flip-flop of support of the Ryan plan, or rather support for social security and medicare, it may be the Republican plan. You see the trick might be that they can say anything, since it is not a law yet. Romney was for it before he was against it, but if the Republicans number one job was to make Obama a one term president, the substance of the bill was not important, because they did not want anything to be done. It would seem that Obamacares is a whole lot more flexible and must be in the right direction if they are running against it.

P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)

Exceptionalism and the Slippery Slope

Two / Posts.

Epoch arrival ?








FN~ 1, 2.


May day ;-) 
Running Joke, We got it!, Now Dat's..., Post Inserted, Update, The Other News as Noted Prior.
(Thrasymachus and* Tergiversate)

Red Bull...

Humpty Dumpty

Pink Floyd ? [!]


* OW ? [!]

March of Times FOOTNOTE 2014 #ONE

3-4-14 : Today / Yesterday 3-3-14 : (?)   Ctrl F (b.s) What, Me Worry? [!]

Note to self:   Rubio/Rice? (...)and the fallacy of the false dilemma? P art !!

3-5-14 :  [a.] Mmmm MOW, MOW, [b.] R.S.V.P., c.Red Bull..., [d.] Tin Foil Herman  [Spoiler Alert.]

3-18-14 [*-1=] A. Notes from Al-Qaeda, b. Para-model, c. ...promote the general..., d. The Billy Club... , e.The Stick and the Carrot? POWER OF WILL? , f. The Other Debates, G. Mess Age Monger, H. I., j. The Tetrahedron Ramble* , k., l. GOP-GAP , m. Debt and Tax Cuts, n. Our Patriotic "Duty" , o. The Straw Bear , p. Borrowed Comment! , q. , r. Tin Foil Herman, S. Geometry , T. Rock, Paper, Scissor?
WTFrac
[*-2=] hecuva D: The Fourth Dimention of Twain / Type-1 Catch-44 [hint: Type-#d=3x4]
[*-3=] A., B. Speculative Physics, C. Rubric's Cube and Rhetorical Realmifications., d., E., f., G. Kit Ten, H. Heuristic Concurrence and , I. My Respects to Those who Celebrate., J. The Be All and End All?

{Hint: Not to pun on the math nor vu due, but there are at least two type-ohs.}

Primary Boogeyman

Rule to the Exception.
Freedom / Hardball
Mitt Romney wins, Paul 2nd, Huntsman 3rd.
Gingrich and South Carolina next.
Huntsman ticket to ride or flavor of moment?

Yeah that's the ticket, but here is even more.

There is the old adage "divide and conquer",
but then there is the exception that proves the rule.
If Republican political calculus is anything, it is attack strength.
Economic Freedom is the key.
What it means, is the meme.
Absolutism may be the red flag of the Teddy Bull,
but the cape* of the progressive.

*Ctrl F "Nietzsche"

[Romney indeed made history as the first non-incumbent Republican to win both Iowa and New Hampshire, but given recent history, Fukuyama and the Neo-cons, it seems to fit the Primary Boogeyman frame, not to mention unprecedented Bush the Uniter.]

[1-11-12 CBS Christie Does Cynical Well, "Jersey-Style" **
CBS Poll Romney beats Obama,
Michelle Beats Anger.]
[My original intent here yesterday, was a Primary Colors reference, and a pun on Exception to Rule, not The Rule, but don't step on my blue suede shoes. (Reference post-**)]

[** I mean the Governor of New Jersey does "lame" well, if as Romney's "hit man" he is accusing Obama of not doing anger well.  Is that Neo-Boogeyman?  A flip-flop of the Doom and Gloom, and more of the Fear and Smear.  Governor Christie is the Sarah Palin with Lip Schtick.  Ouch, that was not to imply that he is a VP choice, but given the frame maybe.  When I use Hyperlink, I use Hyperlink. ]

[4a continued:  Freedom is not a tool***, but an end that doesn't justify economics.  This is my riff off of only the 1st paragraph of The Economist, on Economic blogs and "A less dismal debate." After reading it more fully(see ***) a funny thing happened on the way to the for 'em.  Actually it only hinges on the "tool" concept and the nature of "innovation" and the nature of economic debates.  Not that I have more than glanced at the debate example, but it also hinges on the nature of people as well as material or ideological forms.]
*** again note anacronism of 4m (see asterisks and bracketeds) as I evolved the post comma segment.[being in magazine 4m another one of the 4a.] (Note technical difficulties, uncertain if any threads or hyperlinks are lost, but I close in the middle of reading Marginal Revolutionaries in hard copy.)]


< previous post >